BYD Sealion 06 vs Sealion 7 for Export

EVIDENCE FILE

Records that change the answer

Start with official market specification for each and link it to the VIN before accepting translated trim names or catalogue photographs. Add VIN-linked equipment files so condition or equipment claims can be checked against the actual car. The remaining records establish how the vehicle operates, how it has been treated and whether the proposed route is credible.

1. official market specification for each
2. VIN-linked equipment files
3. same-route energy model
4. family and luggage test
5. delivered-cost comparison

A record remains useful only for the vehicle and moment it describes. Preserve original files, note who supplied them and request a new inspection after a material repair or long custody gap. When another car is offered, discard conclusions that cannot be traced to its VIN.

DECISION TEST

Test the route, not the brochure

A buyer values rear headroom, conventional SUV access and the option of DM-i; another prioritises EV performance and coupé styling. The correct result changes with passengers, energy access and support.

Inspection scope should follow the decision. For this route, check compare exact dimensions and seating use, then separate available propulsion by market. Continue with model charging and tyre costs and record inspect each candidate independently. Measurements, photographs, diagnostics and test conditions are more transferable than labels such as “excellent,” “full option” or “export ready.”

Disclosure makes a limitation discussable; vagueness makes it risky. Define how the issue affects safety, use, compliance, service or resale and who will resolve it. A deposit should not remove the buyer's ability to verify a decisive claim.

VEHICLE-SPECIFIC WORKSHEET

Apply this check to the candidate

Place the required rear passengers and luggage before comparing styling or acceleration. Then model the same charging week and tyre replacement. Sealion 7's coupé profile and EV positioning answer a different brief from a conventional Sealion 06 SUV with DM-i or EV choices. The model number is not a simple trim ladder.

Close the worksheet with a short decision memo for BYD Sealion 06 vs Sealion 7 for Export. State how “compare exact dimensions and seating use” was verified, what record supports “official market specification for each,” and who remains responsible for “inspect each candidate independently.” Add the date, candidate VIN, destination and any condition attached to acceptance. If “same-route energy model” is missing or belongs to another vehicle, leave the conclusion open and price the uncertainty. This memo gives the inspector, buyer, logistics team and destination adviser the same boundary instead of allowing each participant to assume a different version of the purchase.

DESTINATION CONTROL

Carry the same facts through export

Confirm which vehicle and version the destination already recognises. Homologation familiarity can affect time, documents and cost.

Rehearse the export file while the seller still controls the car. Contract, invoice, inspection, customs description and shipping booking should name the same VIN and propulsion. Ask the destination adviser separately about registration and any technical changes required after arrival.

Use a dated worksheet and a single delivery boundary for comparisons. Keep quoted, estimated and conditional lines distinct. Recalculate when currency, vehicle, route, sailing or customs treatment changes rather than carrying an old total into a new transaction.